Linda Ostermann
Poli 480: International Organization
Professor: Mark Shirk
10/30/2013
Adolf Eichmann in Argentina; his removal by Israeli
nationals and his trial
Did Israel violate Argentina’s territorial sovereignty
by abducting Adolf Eichmann without the approval of Argentina’s government?
Otto
Adolf Eichmann was a SS leader in Nazi Germany and was responsible for mass
deportations of Jews into ghettos and extermination camps. One of his major
assignments was to manage the Auschwitz Concentration camp in Poland. After
World War II, Eichmann fled to Argentina. He used a fraudulently laissez-passer
to leave Europe and lived in Argentina under a false identity. On May 11, 1960
Adolf Eichmann was taken to Israel by Israeli nationals. In Israel, Eichmann
was charged with “crimes against the Jewish people” and “crimes against
humanity”. He was executed in June 1960. The removal of Eichmann by Israel led
to many controversies around the world. Israel’s removal of Eichmann was
performed without the knowledge or authority of Argentina. Argentina responded with
submitting a complaint to the Security Council alleging that Israel has
violated the Argentina’s territorial sovereignty rights. After some discussion,
the Security Council adopted on June 28, 1960 a resolution condemning Israel’s
action. As a result of this resolution Israel and Argentina agreed to settle
their differences. On August 8, 1960, they published a joint statement to that
effect.
Some
scholars argue that the removal of Adolf Eichmann was justified under Israeli
law. Eichmann left Europe and entered Argentina under a false identity. In
addition, he was a world-wide sought criminal. Under Israeli law, the trial of
Eichmann was a legal process. In august, 1950, the Knesset adopted the Nazis
and Nazi Collaborators (Punishment) law. Section one of that law described that
any person who has “done during the period of the Nazi regime, in an enemy
country, an act constituting a crime against the Jewish people” or an “act
constituting a crime against humanity” or “an act constituting a war crime” is
liable to the death penalty.
In
my paper I will examine to what extend the right of sovereignty of Argentina
was violated by Israel. In addition, I will focus on finding counter arguments
that state that Israel actions were justified, not only by Israeli law but also
under international law.
Here
are some of the resources I will use:
J.
G. Merrills, “Morality and the International Legal Order,” The Modern Law Review 31:5 (1968), pp. 520-534.
Hans
W. Baade, “The Eichmann Trial: Some Legal Aspects,” Duke Law Journal 1961:3 (1961), pp. 400-420.
David
Luban, “Hannah Arendt as a Theorist of International Criminal Law,” International Criminal Law Review 11:3
(2011), pp. 621-641.
Covey
Oliver, “The Attorney-General of the Government of Israel v. Eichmann,” The American Journal of International Law
56:3 (1962), pp. 805-845.
G.I.A.D.
Draper, “The Eichmann Trial: A Judicial Precedent,” International Affairs 38:4 (1962), pp. 485-493
Laura Webb
ReplyDeletePOLI 480
Research Paper Proposal
The current conflict in Syria has brought significant attention to the United Nations initiative known as The Responsibility to Protect (or R2P). This doctrine is based upon the principle that “sovereignty is not a right, but a responsibility (U.N. World Summit, 2005) .” To enact this duty, R2P suggests a 3 pillar strategy which addresses the following: ( U.N. World Summit, 2009)
1. The State carries the primary responsibility for protecting populations from genocide, war crimes, crimes against humanity and ethnic cleansing, and their incitement;
2. The international community has a responsibility to encourage and assist States in fulfilling this responsibility;
3. The international community has a responsibility to use appropriate diplomatic, humanitarian and other means to protect populations from these crimes. If a State is manifestly failing to protect its populations, the international community must be prepared to take collective action to protect populations, in accordance with the UN Charter.
Since its establishment in 2005, R2P has proven to be controversial, igniting criticism on whether it has been previously effectively employed; or as other critics have concerned, the very nature of R2P is an overstep that violates a state’s national security. My research paper will examine this critique, in conjunction with the range of criticisms made toward R2P. I also will also study its past usage with the international community. I am curious to know the precise way in which R2P has been put into practice, and is so, what was the general consensus on its ability to be effective? Were any suggestions made towards improving its future use? Any interesting conclusions? I am interested to see if any significant points regarding its past usage perhaps could perhaps be used to predict its future role within the International community. The sources listed below will serve as a stepping block into my research on The Responsibility to Protect.
1.http://www.un.org/en/preventgenocide/rwanda/about/bgresponsibility.shtml
2. http://www.globalpost.com/dispatch/news/regions/americas/canada/130830/Obama-canadians-UN-responsibility-to-protect-Syria-strike
3. http://www.un.org/en http://responsibilitytoprotect.org/ICRtoPGAdebate.pdf/ga/search/view_doc.asp?symbol=A/63/677
4. http://www.foreignpolicy.com/articles/2013/09/17/responsibility_to_protect
5. http://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/mnp/gr2p/2011/00000003/00000004/art00006
Hi Laura!
DeleteYour paper proposal is very clear and you included a very specific example. It will be very useful if you were to read "Sharing Sovereignty" by Stephen Krasner. I think this article will help you support your main argument.
Linda, I really think you have a great topic for your paper. It is very specific and easy to understand and gives a unique look on sovereignty. I think testing the sovereignty of Argentina also makes one think about what sovereignty really is.
ReplyDeleteHello Linda, I second Christie's comment, I also think your topic is very crystal-clear. I would add Argentina's neighboring countries' governments' reactions toward's Israel's actions to infiltrate and violate Argentina's territorial sovereignty. Also, I would add if any of the south american countries agrees or disagrees and if they have taken any particular actions to protect their own sovereignty. In general, your topic is great and very interesting : )
ReplyDelete