Failed and quasi-states fail to provide for their
populace, and have more external sovereignty than internal sovereignty. Failed states are equal to states on some
ways and not in others. States like the
Congo and Somalia are examples of failed states, as they are recognized by the
United Nations, but lack an effective internal government. The way these failed states interact as world
players is largely relative to their unequal status in the world system. Due to the uncertain nature of these failed or
quasi-states, foreign intervention can happen for many reasons. Humanitarian, security, and resource driven
interventions can all occur. Many of
these reasons can be used to explain or hypothesis why certain failed states
receive intervention and aid while others do not. Why are certain states intervened in while
others are not? Why did we go into Iraq,
and not Darfur? I argue quasi and failed states are intervened
in when intervention benefits the invading state. Meaning states intervene in quasi-states when
it is in their interest and do not intervene when it does not promote their interest.
First I will provide a brief definition of quasi and
failed states. I will then investigate
locations where intervention has occurred and where it has not. I will focus on Iraq, as the location where
invasion occurred, and Darfur as the location where invasion did not.
Di John, Jonathan. “The Concept, Causes and
Consequences of Failed States: A Critical Review of the Literature and Agenda for Research with Specific Reference to
Sub-Saharan Africa," European Journal of
Development Research. Feb2010, Vol. 22 Issue 1, p10-30.
Flibbert, Andrew. “The Consequences of Forced State Failure in
Iraq.” Political Science Quarterly. Spring2013, Vol. 128 Issue 1,
p67-96. 30p.
I am curious to hear in what ways you determine going into Iraq was in our best interest. Are mainly looking at security, economic, or public relations/image as the primary reasons people go in, or are there other reasons? Do you think states ever invade other states for the good of that states people, or the good of the world, or is it always selfishly motivated like we talked about in class?
ReplyDelete